Updates: 03-11-200903-04-2009 02-16-2009 01-08-2009 12-18-2008 12-13-2008 12-03-2008 11-26-2008 11-15-2008 09-25-2008 09-18-2008 09-03-2008 08-13-2008 07-11-2008 05-28-2008 04-15-2008 03-28-2008 03-22-2008 03-13-2008 03-11-2008 03-06-2008 01-30-2008 01-23-2008 01-16-2008 01-09-2008 12-29-2007 12-12-2007 11-28-2007 11-22-2007 11-16-2007 11-13-2007 11-07-2007 10-31-2007 10-20-2007 10-17-2007 09-26-2007 09-12-2007 08-29-2007 08-23-2007 08-11-2007 07-19-2007 07-11-2007 07-04-2007 06-27-2007 06-20-2007 06-14-2007 06-06-2007 05-30-2007 05-23-2007 05-16-2007 05-09-2007 05-02-2007 04-25-2007 04-18-2007 04-11-2007 04-04-2007 03-28-2007 03-21-2007 03-14-2007 03-08-2007 03-07-2007 03-01-2007 02-28-2007 02-21-2007 02-14-2007 02-07-2007 01-31-2007 01-24-2007 01-17-2007 01-10-2007 01-03-2007 12-20-2006 12-13-2006 12-06-2006 11-22-2006 11-15-2006 11-08-2006 11-01-2006 10-25-2006 10-18-2006 10-11-2006 10-03-2006 09-27-2006 09-20-2006 09-13-2006 09-06-2006 08-30-2006 08-23-2006 08-16-2006 08-09-2006 08-02-2006 07-26-2006 07-12-2006 07-05-2006 06-28-2006 06-21-2006 06-14-2006 05-31-2006 05-22-2006 05-17-2006 05-10-2006 05-03-2006 04-26-2006 04-19-2006 04-12-2006 04-05-2006 03-29-2006 03-22-2006 03-15-2006 03-10-2006 03-08-2006 03-02-2006 02-24-2006 02-15-2006 02-14-2006 02-11-2006 02-09-2006 02-03-2006 01-24-2006 01-19-2006 01-10-2006 01-04-2006 12-20-2005 12-08-2005 12-01-2005 11-15-2005 11-10-2005 11-03-2005 11-02-2005 10-24-2005 10-20-2005 10-16-2005 10-05-2005 09-29-2005 09-22-2005 09-19-2005 09-07-2005 08-11-2005 08-08-2005
|
Weekly Math UpdatesFebruary 15, 2006 This Week's Contents:
Board Meeting Hi all, News Clippings Site Updates My presentation to the board focused on 3 things. First is the article I have previously linked to called the "10 Myths About Math Education and Why You Shouldn't Believe Them." If you didn't read it, it's excellent and shows the fallacies of fuzzy math by listing studies opposing the so-called benefits of the programs. http://www.nychold.com/myths-050504.html Next I spoke about the IOWA test math scores. The district ranges from 9% below national average to 11% above national average in the different areas tested. Computation was the one area that was under national average at every grade level. You can see the details here: http://www.oaknorton.com/imathresults28.cfm Then I addressed the "brain-drain" the district is experiencing through Charter schools. I'm not attempting to provide a scientifically sound analysis of this, but charter schools are getting top students from the district. It shows because their CRT level 4 math mastery is 30% higher than the district in some cases and at some grade levels the charters have no children in levels 1 and 2 (the lowest math mastery levels). It's a direct result of the district's math program and I emphasized that continuing in this direction will cause the district to trend downward every year as the best students are pulled out by their parents for a stronger program. Here's the graphs and data if you want to see them: http://www.oaknorton.com/imathresults29.cfm Lastly, I gave the board a solution. I have been corresponding with some of the top mathematicians in our country at prestigious universities and asked them for their top curriculum picks. I was surprised at the united voice they had around the top two picks. Singapore math was number one, but the problem with it is a lack of teacher materials translated into English. So to run it you have to have really strong math teachers which is very rare in elementary school levels. The number two pick, which becomes number one when you have a lack of strong math teachers, is Saxon. I mentioned to the board that the Deseret News ran an article two weeks ago that said Utah has to hire 44,000 new teachers over the next ten years. That's a terrifying proposition and I spoke as persuasively as I could for the need to put a solid core program into place as the primary curriculum and if it had weaknesses, supplement from that point. Saxon has excellent teacher materials and some have referred to it as teacher-proof, not because teachers with experience can't use the skills they have used for years, but because it keeps everyone on track to cover the appropriate material, in the appropriate order, so that kids build layers upon their core math knowledge. It's the strongest foundation from which to start. The third pick (for your curiosity) degraded and some said Sadlier-Oxford and others some French and Russian programs. Personally, I am all for adopting Saxon K-8 in our district for its strength of standards, and it would help unite charter school students coming back into the district after 6 or 8 years of being in the charter school. The students in both schools would have covered the same materials during that time. Comics Here's a laugh for the week sent to me by one of the petition signers. Till next week, Oak Norton |
|
Copyright 2005-06, All Rights Reserved |